Saturday, October 13, 2007

Calgary Alderman - Ward 12

Nick Halfyard is a political science and history student at the University of Athabasca. To quote his website: "My greatest aspiration is to earn my way to the top of the political ladder and make a difference in this world."

Nick's policy focuses include:
  • Mismanagement and waste on city council
  • Fewer taxes
  • Crime and policing
  • Elimination of the "ambulance fee"
  • Recycling
  • C-train service

In keeping with his fiscal conservative ideals, Nick's free website is located here.

Ric McIver has drawn the ire of some in the ward for being perceived as looking towards to mayor's job in a few years. His critics say that Ric spends too much time thinking about the city as a whole, when there are issues in Ward 12 that need to be looked after. E.S. says "suck it up, princess!". McIver, no matter what his future plans, has served his ward AND his city well since 2001. Which isn't to say Ric shouldn't be challenged... democracy demands that he SHOULD be. He also high-jacked the headlines for several weeks on his personal crusade to have city vehicles display "yellow ribbon" decals, as a sign of our city's support for the Canadian Armed Forces.

Among the issues the McIver campaign identifies:
  • Taxpayer protection
  • Arenas and Recreational facilities
  • Smart Growth
  • LRT Expansion
  • Infrastructure maintenance
  • Affordable Housing

Ric's website - which is a nightmare to navigate and look at, by the way, Ric - is located here.

Thursday, October 11, 2007

Calgary Alderman - Ward 11

Ward 11 is the only ward in the city where there is no incumbent alderman seeking re-election. As such, it poses one of the most intriguing races, as no one has the "incumbent's advantage".

Dave Matthews, as we all know, is a world-famous rock singer. Why he'd want to be a City of Calgary alderman is anyone's guess... what's that? Say again? Oh... how embarassing. Let's try this again...

Dave Matthews is a retiree who thinks that one of the biggest issues facing Calgary is urban sprawl. He wants to increase residential density in existing developments.

Dave's other issues include:
  • Rezoning
  • Transportation
  • Taxation

The Matthews campaign has no website, but you can write Dave at dave-matthews@shaw.ca

James M. (Jim) Murray is a lawyer and resident of ward 11. He lists recreational facilities and park space, and protection of the Glenmore Reservoir as priorities of his. He has chaired several committees for the city.

Murray's other priorities include:
  • Transportation
  • Residential Density
  • Legacies for the Future
  • Homelessness
  • A long-term roadmap for the city's future

You can read more about Murray's campaign on his website, here.

Brian Pincott is a former NDP candidate federally. As mentioned previously in this blog, Calgarians love their municipal politicians when they're unelectable on another level - and if anything is unelectable in Calgary, it's an NDP candidate. Pincott has been extremely active on municipal issues in the past few years, being a leading voice for curbside recycling and also participating in the imagineCalgary project.

Pincott's issues include:
  • Transportation
  • Environment
  • Affordable Housing
  • Smart Growth
  • Livable Neighbourhoods

Brian's website, which includes a list of all of his donors and a VERY detailed "Issues" section is located here.

Jim Rockwell is the owner of Rocky's Burgers (if you haven't tried one, you owe it to yourself), and is making his first foray into politics. Rockwell practices what he preaches, listing his donors on his website, linked below.

Jim's issues for the ward include:
  • Transportation
  • Social Infrastructure
  • Development & land use
  • Crime & safety
  • Environment

Rockwell's on-line home is here.

Evonne Whelan is a former president of the Mount Royal Community Association. She has a very detailed platform on-line, and raises several good issues and solutions.

Among Evonne's focuses:
  • Taxation
  • Crime & Safety
  • Transportation & Roads

Check out Whelan's site for yourself, here.

Calgary Alderman - Ward 10

My apologies for the tardiness, Nation - real life beckoned.

Andre Chabot is the incumbent for this ward, elected in 2005 to replace disgraced alderman Margot Aftergood. He has not been afraid to stand up for issues he believes strongly in, even if they aren't the easiest rows to hoe politically. He has been focusing on affordable housing as late. While many candidates have city-wide platforms, Andre has a platform aimed specifically at the residents and problems in his ward.

Chabot's priorities include:
  • Crime prevention
  • Increased recreational opportunities (rec. centres and arenas)
  • Resurfacing of Memorial Drive

For more on the Chabot campaign, visit his website here.

Nargis Dossa is a social worker, who worries that the bitter aftertaste of the "Ward 10 Scandal" may keep voters from bothering to come out on the 15th. Her primary focus is on social issues, as you might expect from a social worker.

Among Nargis' focuses:
  • Poverty
  • Negative image
  • Homelessness

Nargis' website reads like a resume - useful, but not covering her ideas, just her qualifications. It is located here.

Tuesday, October 9, 2007

Mayoral Forum

There will be an all-candidate's forum for the 9 candidates running for Mayor of Calgary, this evening at Mount Royal College.

It will take place at the Leacock Theatre, from 4:30 to 6:30. The Enlightened Savage will be in the hizz-ouse.

Monday, October 8, 2007

What Do These Schmucks Do? - Mayoral Edition

Back to the Queen's Printer, as (once again), nobody at the City of Calgary is inclined to tell us what the Mayor's job is...

General duties of chief elected official

(1) A chief elected official, in addition to performing the duties of a councillor, must
(a) preside when in attendance at a council meeting unless a bylaw provides that another councillor or other person is to preside, and
(b) perform any other duty imposed on a chief elected official by this or any other enactment or bylaw.
(2) The chief elected official is a member of all council committees and all bodies to which council has the right to appoint members under this Act, unless the council provides otherwise.
(3) Despite subsection (2), the chief elected official may be a member of a board, commission, subdivision authority or development authority established under Part 17 only if the chief elected official is appointed in the chief elected official’s personal name.

(Municipal Government Act, Part Five, Division Three)

So, essentially... the mayor is an "Alderman-at-large" required to swing the gavel at meetings.

Again, as with Aldermen, the Mayor can do much more if he (or she) wants to get re-elected. Ralph Klein, when he was Mayor of Calgary, focused on the task of communicating with the people that the council served. Bronco seems to view the mayor's role as more of a leader, helping to set the priorities of council as he believes the people of Calgary wish them to be. Each mayor, and each candidate for mayor, would bring their own interpretation of what the role actually entails.

As long as they've got good gavel technique, none of them is wrong... but some are more right, in the eyes of the voters, than others. Therein lies the difference between "Mayor Such-and-such" and "defeated mayoral candidate Such-and-such".

What Do These Schmucks Do? - Alderman Edition

The City of Calgary, whether by design or by unbelievable oversight, has NO information available on-line as to what, exactly, an Alderman's job really IS.

Therefore, I have little recourse but to consult the Book of Armaments - er, I mean, the Queen's Printer, and take the words right from the legislative horse's mouth:

General duties of councillors


Councillors have the following duties:
(a) to consider the welfare and interests of the municipality as a whole and to bring to council’s attention anything that would promote the welfare or interests of the municipality;
(b) to participate generally in developing and evaluating the policies and programs of the municipality;
(c) to participate in council meetings and council committee meetings and meetings of other bodies to which they are appointed by the council;
(d) to obtain information about the operation or administration of the municipality from the chief administrative officer or a person designated by the chief administrative officer;
(e) to keep in confidence matters discussed in private at a council or council committee meeting until discussed at a meeting held in public;
(f) to perform any other duty or function imposed on councillors by this or any other enactment or by the council.

(Municipal Government Act, Part Five, Division Three)

Vague? Sure... but that's legislation for you. To avoid having 480 different Acts, they write as vague an Act as possible, so everyone will fit into it.

For their part, the City of Calgary's Bylaw department doesn't list any Bylaws that would amend or add to the responsibilities, as allowed for in section (f).

Near as I can tell, then, the job of an Alderman with the City of Calgary is to a) show up at meetings, and b) don't spill the beans on top-secret projects. At least, legislatively, that's the job. In reality, there are many other things that can win you the support of your constituents for years to come. Acting swiftly and decisively to get their concerns heard and dealt with at City Hall would be a good start.

Of note, is the fact that several candidates for Alderman in this election state on their websites that they intend to "run the ward" in a certain way. In fairness, they MAY mean "run the ward office", and they simply mis-spoke. It should be clearly noted, though, that we are not electing 14 little Mayors to run small segments of the city - an Alderman's job is to represent the people of their ward, not to govern them as a personal fiefdom. The collective will of Council, all 15 members, governs the City of Calgary. Your Alderman "runs" your ward as much as your MLA or MP runs your riding - which is to say, not at all.

THEY make decisions, as part of a larger body, on YOUR behalf. Without you, they have no franchise to exercise. Remember (because some of them will forget from time to time, and will need reminding) that THEY work for YOU. And, if your Alderman HAS forgotten for whom they work in the past 3 years - show up on October 15th and remind them who call the shots.

What Do These Schmucks Do? - School Board Trustee Edition

With thanks to the Albeta School Boards Association, below is an overview of exactly what a "school board trustee" DOES - handy information, when deciding whom you should elect to the job.

All voters are asked at the polling station for which board they wish to elect a trustee - public or catholic. Make sure to get this question right - your taxes go to whichever board you choose, so make sure you have a say in who gets to spend them!

(ASBA text begins now)

What do school trustees do?

Alberta school boards help shape the future of local communities by governing the education of young people. The provincial government, through the minister of learning grants school boards the independent authority to make decisions regarding the direction and quality of local public education. Accountability to the public is entrenched through the election of local school board trustees every three years. The school board election is October 15, 2007.

School board responsibilities

It’s up to school boards to ensure all children in the community receive a quality education. Specific school board responsibilities include:
  • Communicating, informing and involving parents, staff, and the community-at-large in school board decisions and activities.
  • Adopting an annual budget that achieves jurisdiction priorities.
  • Setting goals and priorities for the jurisdiction that achieve provincial education standards, meet the needs of students and reflect the community’s wishes.
  • Making and enforcing policies that set out standards and expectations regarding the actions of administration, teachers, and students.
  • Lobbying the municipal and provincial governments on education issues of importance to the jurisdiction.
  • Adjudicating policy or decision appeals.
  • Hiring and evaluating the superintendent.
The role of the trustees

A key responsibility for trustees is to stay in touch with community stakeholders so that they understand, and reflect in their decision-making, what all citizens value and want from their local public schools. It’s important to note that trustees do not represent any one school, neighbourhood or community. Rather, they make decisions based on the needs of the entire jurisdiction. As elected officials, trustees have these roles:

Communicators: Trustees ensure the community has a say in what children learn by communicating effectively with stakeholders and ensuring their concerns and wishes are heard.

Planners: Trustees develop plans to deal with student needs and to actively participate in the economic and social strength of local communities.

Policy makers: Trustees create policies to guide administration and staff. They also evaluate the impact of these policies and make adjustments where necessary.

Advocates: Trustees address and seek resolution of public education issues of importance to students, parents, and the community at large.

Educators: Trustees play a key role in developing tomorrow’s citizens because they have the ability to make independent decisions that impact the direction and quality of public education.

Adjudicators: Trustees hear and make judgements concerning local education decisions, procedures or policies that individuals, groups or the public feel are unfair or improper.

Lobbyists: Trustees communicate with the municipal and provincial levels of government to ensure those who influence funding and other resources hear the voice of the local community.

Legislators: Trustees can make decisions that have the status and impact of law -- for example, decisions governing and enforcing the conduct of students and staff.

Politicians: Trustees are elected every three years to govern the local public education system on behalf of the community. The democratic process ensures the public remains part of public education.

Calgary Alderman - Ward 9

Joe Ceci has been the area's alderman for the past 12 years. Considered by some to be a natural choice to fill the Mayor's chair when (if?) Bronco takes the next step, Ceci does his best to stay away from controversy whenever he can - the hallmark of a good politician, but a questionable leader. He serves on enough boards and committees to have earned the nick-name of "the hardest working man in municipal politics" (okay, so maybe it's not all that catchy, but still...). Ceci is also one of the few Aldermen in Calgary who actively seeks out input from residents, and then is seen to be ACTING on it (provided it's not too controversial).

Ceci's issues for the ward this term include:
  • Affordable Housing
  • Environmental issues

Joe's website, which spends a lot of time talking about what he HAS done, but little talking about what he WILL do, is here.

Al Koenig, aka "Rambo Al", is perhaps the best-known candidate for a aldermanic seat in this election. Koenig has been front and centre for years as the head of the Calgary Police Association. He recently scored the best quote of the month for his take on the city's wishy-washy policy towards yellow "Support Our Troops" decals on city vehicles:

"I wish they'd be more decisive as far as allowing them on city vehicles because you can't really suck and blow at the same time. You either support it or you don't."


Al spent 27 years in the Calgary Police Service, and worked many different beats - including the arrest of Charles Ng (bonus "Karma points" for Al). He has been criticized by incumbent Ald. Joe Ceci for being a "single issue candidate".

Koenig's issues (political, not personal), include:
  • Improved resources for police, fire and ambulance services
  • Affordable housing and residential density
  • Criminal activity (especially related to prostitution & drugs)
  • Publicly owned community and recreational facilities
  • Managing pedestrian and vehicular traffic

The Koenig website, including a picture of Al with Dog Chapman (MORE bonus points!), is located here.

Stan Waciak has run for this seat previously, and is giving it the old college try yet again. Much like Ceci, Stan tends to focus more on the social issues facing the ward than the enforcement and regulatory side of things.

Among Stan's issues:
  • Access to transportation
  • High cost of living
  • Youth outreach programs

Waciak has no web-site that the Enlightened Savage can find. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong about that. :)

Sunday, October 7, 2007

Calgary Alderman - Ward 8

Steve Chapman is a controversial candidate for this seat, as he makes no bones about his socially conservative views. He is a former cop and National President of the Progressive Group for Independent Business - the group run by Craig Chandler (Yes, THAT Craig Chandler). Chapman has run in this ward twice before, in 2001 and in 2004, when he narrowly lost to incumbent Madeleine King.

Among Chapman's issues:
  • Traffic safety
  • Allowing by-law officers to take over non-urgent police tasks, freeing up police for emergencies
  • Affordable housing
  • Taxation issues
  • Transparency on council & communication with communities

More information is available on Steve Chapman's website, here.

Madeleine King is the incumbent for Ward 8. She took a lot of flak in this term for a variety of issues - her stance on the smoking ban and complaints about the unruly masses on the "Red Mile", as examples - but also overcame a bout with Cancer. It's hard to criticize someone for poor job performance when they're fighting a deadly disease without sounding like a total heel, yet that's what Madeleine's opponents have to deal with in this election.

King's focuses for the next term include:
  • Homeless issues
  • Economic development
  • Preservation of historical buildings

Madeleine's campaign website - which is a little light on details - is located here.

Lindsay Luhnau needs to get elected to city council. As a fellow sufferer of "Sid's Meier's Civilization" addiction, I hope that the city's benefits package covers treatment. The province's package sure doesn't. :( In all seriousness, though, Lindsay *could* be pigeon-holed as the "green" candidate in her ward, and dismissed for her youthful ignorance, but the reality is that many of her VERY detailed plans and suggestions are not just things that the city CAN do to reduce its environmental footprint, they are things that we SHOULD do, no matter who wins Ward 8.

The "Five Pillars" of Lindsay's plan are:
  • Encouraging smart growth
  • Water protection
  • Supporting green transportation
  • Materials and resource efficiency
  • Arts and Parks for People

You can read more of Lindsay's ideas (there are a LOT of them, and they are very, very good) at her website, here.

John Mar is a former RCMP officer, which (I think) trumps Steve Chapman's ex city-cop for winning the coveted "law enforcement" demographic, but I could be wrong. Mar has run into trouble in this campaign because of his penchant for sounding too, well, political. Being able to talk for a long time without saying anything substantive isn't going to win this ward - they've already got an Alderman who can do that quite well.

Among Mar's policy points:
  • 400 new police officers for the city, including 100 in the downtown core.
  • Infrastructure concerns, including Transportation Oriented Development.
  • Transitional housing for the working poor

More on John and his policies can be found on his campaign website, here.

ADDENDUM: Incumbent Alderman Madeleine King, and candidates John Mar, Lindsay Luhnau and Steve Chapman will be participating in an all-candidates forum on Wednesday, October 10th from 5:30 to 8:30 pm. It will be held at Broken City Social Club, 613 - 11 Ave SW

Saturday, October 6, 2007

Calgary Alderman - Ward 7

Jag Aithal is focused mainly on security and public safety. His background is in strategic studies and emergency preparedness - both of which he says the city needs, in spades.

Jag's issues for the city and the ward include:
  • Affordable Housing
  • Tax Caps
  • Disaster Management
  • Crime Reduction
  • Council transparency and accountability

EDIT: In keeping with his stand on transparency and accountability, Jag released a list of donors to his campaign on September 25th. It is located on his website. You can read more about Jag and his policies on his campaign website, here.

Barry Eldridge was 2nd in the race for mayor at one point in the campaign... problem is, he's not running for mayor. He briefly considered filing nomination papers for the mayor's chair, but instead is running for Alderman in ward 7. He feels the incumbent ignores the communities on the outskirts of the ward in favour of the "sexier" downtown core, and its headline-grabbing problems. He has no website.

Druh Farrell has been the Alderman for ward 7 since 2001. Much of the ward has since been designated for revitalization - what had been neighbourhoods abandoned to crime and disrepair are becoming trendy, condo communities over-run with yuppies. She has been nick-named "The Queen of Traffic Calming" for her support of nimby-types who insist that no one should be able to drive on the roads in their community (which all Calgarians pay for, by the way) unless they live there.

Farrell's big issues include:
  • Council accountability and transparency
  • Crime prevention
  • Homelessness solutions
  • Prevention of "cut-through" traffic (see above)
The Farrell campaign can be found here.

Merle Terleski (or Terlesky) is a regular feature on the "letters to the editor" page on the Calgary Sun. Merle's got a lot of opinions, so he's doing the democratically responsible thing and coming forward to run for office.

Merle's ideas include:
  • A graduated taxation system for senior home owners
  • More frequent C-Train service, with 4-car trains
  • Cancelling of the curbside recycling program
  • Giving some policing responsibilities currently only under the Calgary Police Service to bylaw officers

Merle's website, which could really REALLY use a spell-check program, is here.

Friday, October 5, 2007

Calgary Alderman - Ward 6

Rosemary Berglund has withdrawn from the race, although her name will still appear on the ballot. Berglund stated that she was withdrawing because her presence in the race would result in too much vote-splitting in the quest to unseat the incumbent.

Craig Burrows has lived in the riding since 1994, and has served as Alderman for Ward 6 since 2001. He has drawn criticism from residents on a number of fronts, most notably accusations that he is a "corporate puppet", however he takes a licking and keeps on ticking. He has publicly mused about running Federally for the Conservatives at some point in the future.

Burrows' big issues include:
  • A "zero-tolerance" attitude towards crime and "bad behaviour"
  • Affordable housing
  • Recycling & composting
  • Phasing out the use of pesticides

You can read more about the Burrows campaign on their website, here.

Joe Connelly is a former #2 at Tourism Calgary. He believes that the incumbent has effectively abandoned the voters of the ward.

Among Connelly's issues are:
  • Westward expansion of the C-Train
  • Communication between city management and the residents of the ward
  • Increase the number of police on the streets
  • Surveillance cameras in the downtown core

Joe's website can be found here.

James Istvanffy is a leadership consultant, and former assistant to Calgary West MP Rob Anders. A longtime political participant, his focus seems to be on transit issues.

With thanks to the sleuthing of Kirk Schmidt, the Istvanffy campaign website is located here. James' biography is also available here. Conspicuously, Istvanffy goes to GREAT lengths to avoid naming the MP for whom he previously worked for 7 years.

James Kohut believes that Craig Burrows works for his corporate donors and friends, not for the people of Ward 6. One could be forgiven for thinking that Kohut is a "professional candidate": Kohut has run, and lost, in this ward for Alderman in 2004; in Calgary Glenmore (2001) and Calgary West (2004) provincially (for the Greens); in Calgary South-East (2000) and Calgary South-West (2002) federally (for the Greens) and in Calgary West (2004) federally (for the Canadian Action Party).

Confused? Here's the timeline...
2000 - Calgary South-East (federal) - Green Party of Canada
2001 - Calgary Glenmore (provincial) - Green Party of Alberta
2002 - Calgary South-West (federal) - Green Party of Canada
June 2004 - Calgary West (federal) - Canadian Action Party
October 2004 - Ward 6 (municipal)
November 2004 - Calgary West (provincial) - Green Party of Alberta

So, quite clearly, James Kohut very badly wants to serve his follow citizens. His big issues in this municipal election include:

  • Campaign finance reform
  • Banning urban sprawl and land annexations
  • Eradicating homelessness
  • Westward C-Train line and improved bus service

The Kohut campaign can be found on-line here.

Thursday, October 4, 2007

Calgary Alderman - Ward 5

Mohamed El-Rafih is a life-long resident of the area who just graduated from the University of Calgary's Political Science program. He feels the ward needs new representation, with a focus on what he calls the "Four Key Pillars":

  • Justice
  • Democracy
  • Health & Education
  • Infrastructure

It makes for a heck of a slogan, but the devil, as they say, is in the details. Detailed policies aren't available on Mohamed's website, despite a "Policy" tab. Either my computer is broken (in which case, Best Buy had better batten down the hatches - this is a new machine!), or his website is. You can find the site here.

Ray Jones is the incumbent for the ward, and has served for the past 14 years as area Alderman. He has managed to fly under the radar for the past decade and a half, while by most accounts doing a decent job as a spokesman for the ward. He voted in favour of moving the smoking ban ahead (as much good as that did). His big issue seems to be the lack of recreational facilities in his ward and the city as a whole. He has no web-site.

UPDATE: Separate (Catholic) School Board Trustee - Wards 11 & 12

As broken on this board by Kirk Schmidt, the incumbent Trustee for Wards 11 & 12, Cathie Williams, has withdrawn from the race. Williams intends to run for the Liberal nomination in the provincial riding of Calgary Egmont.

Her name will still appear on the ballot, however a notice will be posted that she is not, in fact, running for the position. Should she still receive more votes than her only other competitor (Michael Annuik), a by-election will be held.

Wednesday, October 3, 2007

Calgary Alderman - Ward 4

Richard Evans identifies himself as the "transportation candidate" for this ward. Both private and public transportation top his agenda. He has been the subject of a LOT of ugly rumours on-line. The truth is, I can't find anything to substantiate those rumours, so I have to assume that, at this point, they're baseless innuendo. Ah, politics. But even so, these are the UGLIEST kinds of rumours, so somebody is playing a very, very dirty game here, and I hope they get exposed. This kind of baseless garbage is what keeps people like the Enlightened Savage from running for public office in the first place.

Richard's priorities, if elected, include:

  • Freeze property taxes for fixed-income seniors
  • Addressing the housing crunch by allowing secondary suites
  • Re-addressing of "traffic calming" measures
  • More money for the Calgary Police Service
  • A formal, publicly accessible record of how every council member votes on every issue put before City Council (how, in a city like Calgary, has this NOT been the case for so long?!?)

The Evans campaign can be found on-line here.

Bob Hawkesworth is runing for his third term as Alderman for this Ward. He previously served as Alderman for Ward 3, and also represented the provincial riding of Calgary Mountain View as an NDP member of the legislature - for 2 terms! See, Nation? Calgary HAS INDEED elected "Dippers" in the past - it's not just a nasty rumour. :) Bob's big issues are environmental concerns, and poverty.

Interestingly, Bob's website spends a lot of time talking about what he HAS done, but little talking about what he INTENDS to do. Accidental, or a sign of a lack of purpose? Time will tell what the voters think.

You can see for yourself here.

Alex Peterson is a student at SAIT who, admirably, is running because in the last election, nobody WOULD run against Hawkesworth, who won by acclamation. Peterson is particularly concerned with crime in the area.

Tuesday, October 2, 2007

Waterloo, or Trafalgar?

Nation, there comes a time in each leader's rule when their mettle is tested, and measured. A moment, an opportunity, for them to step forward from the shadows of history and define themselves by a singular choice, a definitive, history-making decision that will ensure their place in the annals of time immemorial. They get to make a choice that determines whether they are remembered as a great leader, or as a failure.

For the Honourable Edward Michael Stelmach, Thirteenth Premier of the Province of Alberta, Eighteenth Leader (if you count Bennett twice) of the Progressive Conservative Party of Alberta nee the Alberta Conservative Party nee the Northwest Territories Liberal-Conservative Party, that moment has arrived.

The report of the Auditor General of Alberta, Fred Dunn, has come back with absolutely scathing reports of mismanagement of the wealth and resources that belong to all Albertans. From oilsands royalties to ministerial expenses, this report paints a damning picture of a party that has lost touch with itself and its founding principles.

If Premier Stelmach does not act decisively on this report, his party will also quickly lose touch with Albertan voters.

THIS is the moment which will define Ed Stelmach, and his legacy of leadership. 30 years from now, students will either look in their history books and read about the man who cleaned up the PC Party and led his province on to further greatness, fully harnessing the energies and potential of the land and its people... or they will read about the man who squandered his chance at greatness, sent it to committees and hearings, and eventually oversaw the collapse of a 3 decades-long hold onto the seat of power in Alberta.

The PC Party is rotting. It is dying from stagnation... it hasn't changed in almost 15 years - it hasn't HAD to. What this report gives Ed, though, is a chance to walk into that board room, drop a copy on the table (carefully, Ed - it's almost 400 pages), and blow up the whole damned thing and start over. It's CLEARLY what this party, and this government (NO, PC ideologues, they are NOT the same thing) sorely needs.

When Klein won the leadership of the PC Party, he left little doubt that this was NOT your daddy's PC Party. The feel-good, don't-worry-be-happy days were over. Yes, we are in charge, yes, we were in charge when the NEP came in, and when this debt and deficit first hit the books, but that was THEN, and this is NOW. We're cutting, well, EVERYTHING. We're paying, as a province, for our past sins. Please, Lord, give us another oil boom, and we promise we won't piss away the money like we did the last time.

And, for years, Ralph stuck to it. Voters rewarded him, time after time, with staggering majorities. They didn't view the debt and deficit as PC Party creations, they viewed them as LOUGHEED and GETTY PC Party creations. The guys in charge NOW? They're not Lougheed and Getty's PC's, they're Ralph's Team. They're fixing it.

And then, over time, things started breaking down again.

Well, Fred Dunn has just produced a 400-page "Fix It" List, and now the ball is in Ed's court. Will he step up to the mic, beg forgiveness for the party's sins, and then, in the same press conference, roll out a list of sweeping changes that will improve accountability and refresh the benches of government and the hallways of power? He'd better, because if Ed doesn't replace the people in charge, then Henry and Martha will. This kind of report leads to the six deadliest words in Alberta politics: "They're no better than the Liberals".


That's the tipping point... once you get there, there is no turning back. You're done.

The Stelmach administration is still new enough that Ed can cop a plea to the people of Alberta, and say "I had no idea it was this bad, we're fixing it right now, starting today, and here's how". If he does that, the voters will reward him for his honest and forthright admission. If he is NOT seen to be moving on this file, and moving full-speed ahead as of 20 seconds after he turned the last page on the report, then he and his government, and his party, will be held accountable to and by the people.

Albertans will forgive many things, if proper penitence is paid, and if someone acts truly repentant. But they need to see swift and decisive action to deal with the malaise, greed, arrogance, and addiction to power that this report speaks to. They are cancers that are running rampant through the PC Party - and if Martha and Henry don't see Dr. Ed Stelmach aggressively excising those cancers, they're going to write off the patient.

Ultimately, leaders are defined by their "NOW" moments... nobody remembers Nelson's defeats, they remember his heroic Victory (pun intended) at Trafalgar... few think of Napoleon as ruler of Europe - instead, they think of the small man who saw his nation's hopes for dominance crushed at Waterloo.

Ultimately, these next few days - 2 weeks, at the most - will define Ed Stelmach as a leader. How will our grand-children view early October, 2007? As Ed Stelmach's Waterloo, or as his Trafalgar?

Alberta waits with baited breath to find out.

Calgary Alderman - Ward 3

George Chahal has lived in the riding since he was 10 years old. He is passionate about sports and has worked for the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce as a Financial Advisor before becoming a planner, and Vice-President of a housing company.

Chahal's issues for the riding include:

  • Affordable Housing
  • Creating Healthy and livable communities
  • Environmental Responsibility
  • Integrity & Accountability
  • Transportation & Infrastructure

The Chahal campaign website is located here.

Helene Larocque is coming off her first term as Alderman. Her term has been wrought with internal squabbling in the Ward, and she is widely considered to be at risk of losing the seat, as several community groups have very publicly come out against her in recent months. Typical complains include not returning phone calls from residents, her "abrasive" personality, and her need to "Larocque-ize" everything - with one executive of a community association suggesting that if they installed a new porta-potty, Helene would want to stage a photo-op and ribbon-cutting for it.

Larocque's big issues include:

  • C-Train expansion
  • Traffic conjestion and subsequent pollution
  • Recycling programs
  • Environmental concerns

Helene's website can be found here.

Jim Stevenson is a Calgary businessman with 25 years of volunteer experience in the ward. He has a blog on his campaign website (kudos), but hasn't updated it in several days (Pssst! Hey, Jim... there's an election going on, dude...). He is generally considered to be the biggest challenger to the incumbent in this ward.

Stevenson's vision for Ward 3 includes:

  • Reliable transportation systems
  • Building commerce centres near communities
  • New schools for the Ward
  • Well-planned neighbourhoods
  • Improved recreational opportunities
The Stevenson campaign website is here.

There will be a debate between candidates for this seat on city council on October 11th - at the Saddleridge Community Hall, 7:00 pm.

Monday, October 1, 2007

Calgary Alderman - Ward 2

Terry Avramenko is the president of the Ranchlands community association. He is a well-known community organizer. His big issues for the riding and city include:


  • North West expansion of the C-Train.
  • Secondary Suites and affordable housing
  • Traffic Calming
  • Public Toilets in the downtown core
  • More off-leash areas for pets

Terry's website is available here.

Daniel M. Del Re is a machine operator who ran for this seat in 2004. Little else is available on this candidate.

Del Re's website is located here.

Gord Lowe has served the riding as Alderman since 2001. He lists transportation woes and property taxes as his big concerns. His main issues for this term include:


  • Completion of the North West C-Train expansion.
  • More recreational and employment opportunities in the Ward.
  • Curb-side recycling
  • Expansion of Fire, Police and EMS service
  • Improve city attractions and preserve historic buildings.

Alderman Lowe's website is here.

Biagio Magliocca is a 42 year old airport consultant who suggests that himself and all of the residents of Ward 2 comprise "Team Magliocca". He has lived in the Ward for 8 years.

"Team Magliocca's" big issues are:


  • Crime
  • Expanded EMS service
  • Improved communications with residents
  • More recycling depots
  • Civic support of our troops

The Team Magliocca website is right here.

Sunday, September 30, 2007

Calgary Alderman - Ward 1

Jennifer Banks is a social worker by trade, with a solid background in helping environmental causes. In short, she's a perfect example of how Calgarians like their municipal politicians: completely unelectable in this city to any other level of government. :) Her four focuses are:


  • Creating communities of character
  • Green growth, sustainable city
  • Increasing affordable housing
  • Governing with integrity and respect

Jennifer also keeps a blog on her website, so big props for that. She has a Facebook group, and posts her schedule on-line, so clearly she's trying to use "new media" to overcome the differential in name recognition between her and the incumbent. Her website is here.

Dale Hodges is the incumbent for Ward 1. He has served the riding since 1983, and is seeking his 9th mandate from the voters.

His issues and goals for the next term include:

  • Sustainable growth of the transportation infrastructure in Calgary.
  • Sustainable land use planning framework
  • Sustainable long-term planning, financially (anyone else see a pattern here?)
  • Affordable housing
Dale's website, complete with his home and cell-phone numbers, is located here.

Normand Perrault ran in the last election, losing handily to Dale Hodges. Despite the fact that this is his second run at office, there is precious little information available about him or his policies. Tip to Normand: Get a website! Heck, a Blog is even FREE! :)

More on the Public School Trustee Races

Nation, I received an anonymous recommendation - 4 times, actually - that I've posted below.

"If you can't attend a forum and are interested in learning more about the candidates for public school trustee, go to www.capsc.ca and download the 2007 Trustee Elections newsletter. The Calgary Association of Parents and School Councils has asked candidates to fill out a questionnaire and you can find their answers there."

It certainly makes for interesting reading... take it with a grain of salt, as it's the candidates putting the best possible spin on themselves, but check it out for yourselves.

Saturday, September 29, 2007

Separate (Catholic) School Board Trustee - Wards 13 & 14

Mary Martin has been acclaimed in these wards, as the only candidate to file papers. Her main issue is the lack of funding that the board receives from the province. She is a registered nurse and mother of 4, who has a long history of volunteer work in the Calgary Catholic school system.

Separate (Catholic) School Board Trustee - Wards 11 & 12

Michael Vincent Annuik is an entrepreneur involved in oilfield equipment. He has expressed frustration with the Bishop's Office over their dictate that Catholic schools must forego fundraising through gaming, yet the not-exactly bankrupt Catholic Church muckity-mucks are not suggesting ways to replace that income. He fears that parents may be asked to pick up the slack through increased school fees - fees that many families can hardly afford as is.

Cathie Williams has withdrawn from the race to seek the provincial Liberal nomination for the riding of Calgary Egmont.

Friday, September 28, 2007

Separate (Catholic) School Board Trustee - Wards 9 & 10 and Chestermere

Michael O'Malley, elected to this seat in the last election before being judicially disqualified from service to the board while he was simultaneously suing it, filed papers to run for the seat again. He was disqualified from candidacy for both this election and the 2010 election, but his name may still appear on the ballot.

Gerald Adam "Jerry" Heighes has served this area as their trustee in the past, before going down to what he described as "attack ads" by O'Malley in the last election. He bills himself as the only candidate living in the riding, and then (ironically) proceeds to attack his opponent on his website, located here.

Rosemarie Goerlitz ran in Wards 3 & 5 and Airdrie in the last election, and was defeated. The former teacher is running to repair the damage she feels was done to the ward by the O'Malley debacle of the past years.

The candidate's forum will take place on October 9, 2007, at 7:00 p.m. at Holy Cross School (3719 - 26 Avenue SE).

Separate (Catholic) School Board Trustee - Wards 6 & 8

Lois Burke-Gaffney is the incumbent trustee for this seat, which she has held since 1992. Her website, which is shockingly short on detail, is located here.

Antoni (Tony) Grochowski is a former high school teacher running for the seat. He is a firm believer in the obligation of the CSSD to follow the directives of the Bishop's office.

A candidate's forum will be held October 4, 2007, at 7:00 p.m at St. Gregory School (5340 - 26th Ave SW).

Separate (Catholic) School Board Trustee - Wards 4 & 7

Margaret Belcourt has most recently served as the board's Vice Chair, and has been acclaimed for this seat. She served the CSSD as a teacher for 35 years.

Separate (Catholic) School Board Trustee - Wards 3 & 5 and Airdrie

Linda Wellman, the incumbent, has been acclaimed for this seat.

Wellman has served as a trustee for 15 years. Her platform is available on her website, here.

Wednesday, September 26, 2007

Kirk Schmidt checks in...

Nation, you've read on these pages before about my admiration for the kind of commitment and courage that it takes to put yourself "out there" as a candidate in an election - ESPECIALLY as an Independent candidate, running against party-backed contenders.

Kirk Schmidt is such a candidate, spreading his Independent gospel in the federal riding of Calgary West, currently held by the incumbent Darth Anders.

Kirk checked in with me this week to let me know how the campaign planning is going. Of course, not knowing when the writ will be dropped for a federal election makes the Schmidt campaign's job much harder than it already is - but they're working their collective butts off under the assumption that tomorrow will be the day. If not, then maybe the day after... point being, they're prepared, organized, and ready to engage the people of Calgary West. I'd also like to point out that, at this point, Kirk is one of only 2 politicians from Alberta listed on the "Canadian Politics" application on Facebook (the other being some guy named Harper).

Along the ideas I really like are the "I Support Kirk Schmidt" cards that will be made available. Buttons are SO 1960. :) Likewise, Kirk will be holding several events that will give Joe Voter a chance to get out, hear, and SPEAK TO the candidate. Taken straight from the horse's mouth:

"An Independent Vision for Calgary West and Canada" - Formal address by Kirk Schmidt, Independent Candidate for Calgary West, followed by a question period and meet-and-greet. This is taking place on Sunday, October 21, at the Silver Springs Community Centre at 7:00pm. Bring a few friends and come see the vision that Kirk has for the riding and the country.

Sunday Policy Talks - During the federal election, a number of Sunday evenings will be reserved for Coffee and Policy talks at local establishments within the Calgary West riding. This will be an opportunity for you, and others, to make any concerns known, provide your thoughts on different policies, and to get acquainted with Kirk. Specific details will be available on the website. Make sure you come out, have a cup of coffee, and chat with the next Member of Parliament for Calgary West.

Nation, I have stated before, and will continue to assert that the "Party System" will be the ruin of democracy. Take advantage of this rare chance to actually sit down and have a conversation with someone who wants to be the MP for Calgary West.

Often, when you attend a Town Hall or a similar function featuring an MP or candidate from a party, they'll talk at the audience for a while, and then the "reception" will see them talking to a donor or party insider for 40 minutes at a time, while you can't even approach them to say "hello", forget about raising an issue and getting an earnest and forthright answer.

Kirk Schmidt operates differently... he CARES what you think, because, unlike many in the "party system", Kirk knows that the MP is ruled by the voters, not the other way around. I encourage you to go out to see Kirk on October 21st (E.S. will be in the house!), and take the time to talk to the man. I think you'll like what you hear.

For more information regarding the Kirk Schmidt campaign to save Calgary West from the "backroom boys", go to Kirk's website.

- E.S.

"The best things in life are free..."

"So you can give 'em to the birds and bees..."

Nation, thank you for regularly coming back, and making The Enlightened Savage the citizen journalism juggernaut that is has become. Please make sure you help us fight the good fight by clicking on the "google ads" on the right of your screen. I've seen ads for Alnoor, ads for the Alberta Liberals, ads for pollsters - so at least Google is getting the idea of what the citizens of E.S. Nation are interested in. :)

Keep the faith, citizens... E.S. Nation SCHWAG is coming soon!

- E.S.

Separate (Catholic) School Board Trustee - Wards 1 & 2 and Cochrane

Serafino Scarpino is the incumbent for this seat and, as he is running unopposed, he has been acclaimed. A teacher for 30 years, this will be Scarpino's second term in office.

Tuesday, September 25, 2007

Public School Board Trustee - Wards 12 & 14

Carol Bazinet is the incumbent for this seat on the CBE's ruling body. Bazinet has served on the board since December of 2003, and is currently the board's Vice-Chair. Her husband is a CBE teacher, and they have 5 children. Most recently, she made headlines for her proposal that the CBE institute an alternative, faith-based curriculum.

Gregory C. Humphreys is a father of two, who has grown disillusioned with the CBE's inability to get its financial house in order. Further, he feels the board needs to be more PROactive in finding solutions to problems, rather than commisioning studies while schools are falling apart around the students' ears.

Monday, September 24, 2007

A Note On Municipal Election Coverage

As the campaign wages on, I will no doubt obtain more and more information about candidates, their websites (if applicable), etc. Please check back often for the races that impact you - the posts will be updated as more information becomes available.

- E.S.

Public School Board Trustee - Wards 11 & 13

Current trustee Nancy Close is not seeking re-election for this seat.

Deborah Duncan is a retired lawyer with 2 teen-aged children in the system. She favours a long-term sustainable agreement with the province to deal with the chronic underfunding of public schools. She is also in favour of exploring alternatives that will better serve students within the constraints of the current funding formula. Her website is here.

Karen Kryczka is a former MLA for the PC's in Calgary West. She argues that her political connections will be a valuable asset in discussion with the province.

Neil Mackie is a father of 2, who believes that the board is failing in its responsibility to engage and discuss issues with the parents of the children in their care. Neil's website is located here.

Kathy Power is an entrepreneur and mother who feels that the CBE needs to restore accountability and transparency before it tries to re-invent the wheel. She can be found here.

Sunday, September 23, 2007

Public School Board Trustee - Wards 8 & 9

The incumbent for this seat, Pat Cochrane, is running unopposed for this position and, as such, has been acclaimed. Cochrane has served on the CBE board of trustees since 1999, and is its most recent Chair.

Well Done, Nation!

The citizens of the E.S. Nation have come through in spades, with a full 88% of those polled saying they would be casting votes in the upcoming Calgary Municipal Election. (Those who live in Ward 10 pledged to vote at LEAST once!)

Th 12% who said they would not be voting cited living outside of Calgary as an excuse. I guess we'll let that one slide... for now. :)

Now, if only we can get 88% voter turn-out in the election itself. Spread the word, Nation - inspire your fellow citizens to vote! We are all affected by the choices that the mayor and council make - we should all have a say in who they are.

As always, you can just send those disinclined to vote to the Enlightened Savage - E.S. will set them straight. :)

Saturday, September 22, 2007

Public School Board Trustee - Wards 6 & 7

Drake Hammill is the former head of the custodian's union, and a former candidate for President of the AUPE. School upkeep and infrastructure are his 2 big issues. He made headlines last year when he, as president of AUPE Local 40, invited PC MLA's to tour the public schools that were most in need of repair, including the highly-publicized troubles at Western Canada High School.

George Lane (Incumbent) was acclaimed in the last election, but faces challengers on 2 fronts this time around. George is well-prepared for the election, however, as his policies and platform are on-line here. George is the first Trustee candidate I've examined so far with a campaign website, so we know he's taking the election seriously, and taking nothing for granted. Lane believe strongly in access to early childhood education, including full-time kindergarten and junior kindergarten for parents who want it (we used to call it "play school", back in the day). How exactly he plans to pay for the programs, he hasn't said. E.S. being a softie for bloggers, you can find George's blog here.

Greg Scott is a lawyer who served as the CBE's Head Counsel for a time. He feels his knowledge of the legal issues and legislation related to the running of the schools would be an asset as a trustee. Scott is also a former teacher, although it should be noted that being a teacher doesn't make one any more qualified to run a school board than, say, being a traffic cop makes you qualified to be the Commissioner of the RCMP. They're 2 entirely different animals.

Friday, September 21, 2007

Public School Board Trustee - Wards 5 & 10

Without an incumbent running (Kyle Fawcett, the former trustee, is planning to run for MLA), the race for wards 5 and 10 should be a hotly contested one.

Pamela King is a mother of 2 and former CBE employee who feels that the board's most pressing issue is its labour crunch. She feels that the board needs to de a better job attracting and retaining top-level staff (read: scream at the province for more money).

Michael Peter Stefanyshyn is a former High School teacher who left the classroom disgusted with the politics within the system (a common refrain among teachers at the high school level). In his estimation, if he was going to have to deal with politics anyway, it may as well be an OFFICIAL part of the job, instead of an unfortunate necessity. The 27 year-old feels that more money needs to made available to the "front lines" of education - the classroom - that is tied up in unneccesary overhead costs and grossly disproportionate levels of administration staff.

Thursday, September 20, 2007

Public School Board Trustee - Wards 3 & 4

There are 2 candidates vying for this position on the province's largest school board. They are Lynn Cameron Ferguson (Incumbent), and Jadine Kohut.

Lynn Cameron Ferguson handily won this seat in 2004, running to replace the outgoing incumbent. Aged 54, her main issue is school funding - she wants more. Well, she wants more schools, AND more funding. She's well thought of as an activist for student causes.

EDIT: Lynn's website can be found here.

Jadine Kohut is a 39 year-old stay-at-home mom of 3, and she is angry at what seems to be an "old boys backroom mentality" at the board, especially as relates to prioritizing school building and repairs. She wants more transparent and accountible governance of the system by the board. A particular area of interest to her is a new Public high school in the North Central Calgary area.

Wednesday, September 19, 2007

Public School Board Trustee - Wards 1 & 2

Gordon Dirks has been acclaimed for this position.

Dirks has held this seat since 1999.

Monday, September 17, 2007

By-election Results

EDIT 11:28 Mountain Time:

Results are final, with all polls reporting.


Final returns from the Federal By-elections in Quebec tonight.

Outremont
168 of 168 polls
Thomas Mulcair (NDP) 47.5%
Jocelyn Coulon (Lib) 29.0%
Jean-Paul Gilson (BQ) 10.9%
Gilles Duguay (Con) 8.6

Roberval--Lac-Saint-Jean
194 of 194 polls
Denis Lebel (Con) 59.4%
Céline Houde (BQ) 27.0%
Louise Boulanger (Lib) 9.6%

Saint-Hyacinthe--Bagot
224 of 224 polls
Ève-Mary Thaï Thi Lac (BQ) 42.1%
Bernard Barré (Con) 37.5%
Brigitte Sansoucy (NDP) 7.9%
Jean Caumartin (Lib) 7.4%


Analysis after the votes are all counted... but a very, VERY bad night to be Stephane Dion.

Official 2007 Calgary Municipal Election Candidates

The papers are filed... here are your contenders!

(On a side note... I'm not crazy about the official candidate's list having the candidates' HOME ADDRESSES on it, for public view... that's GOT to be a privacy/safety concern, doesn't it?)

MAYOR

Bertram, David
Bronconnier, Dave (Incumbent)
Fielding, Elizabeth
Foster, Allan
Heck, Harry
Jenkins, Sandy
Kassam, Alnoor
Sunstrum, Jonathan Joseph (JJ)
Zhao, Jeremy



ALDERMAN

Ward 1
Banks, Jennifer
Hodges, Dale (Incumbent)
Perrault, Normand

Ward 2
Avramenko, Terry
Del Re, Daniel M.
Lowe, Gord (Incumbent)
Magliocca, Biagio

Ward 3
Chahal, George
Larocque, Helene (Incumbent)
Stevenson, Jim

Ward 4
Evans, Richard
Hawkesworth, Bob (Incumbent)
Peterson, Alex

Ward 5
El-Rafih, Mohamed
Jones, Ray (Incumbent)

Ward 6
Berglund, Rosemary
Burrows, Craig (Incumbent)
Connelly, Joe
Istvanffy, James Donald
Kohut, James

Ward 7
Aithal, Jag
Eldridge, Barry
Farrell, Druh (Incumbent)
Terlesky, Merle

Ward 8
Chapman, Steve
King, Madeleine (Incumbent)
Luhnau, Lindsay
Mar, John

Ward 9
Ceci, Joe (Incumbent)
Koenig, Al
Waciak, Stan

Ward 10
Chabot, Andre (Incumbent)
Dossa, Nargis

Ward 11
Matthews, Dave
Murray, James M. (Jim)
Pincott, Brian
Rockwell, Jim
Whelan, Evonne

Ward 12
Halfyard, Nick
McIver, Richard William (Ric) (Incumbent)

Ward 13
Colley-Urquhart, Diane Marie (Incumbent) (acclaimed)

Ward 14
Fox-Mellway, Linda (Incumbent) (acclaimed)



PUBLIC SCHOOL BOARD TRUSTEE


Wards 1 & 2
Dirks, Gordon (Incumbent) (acclaimed)

Wards 3 & 4
Ferguson, Lynn Cameron (Incumbent)
Kohut, Jadine

Wards 5 & 10
King, Pamela
Stefanyshyn, Michael Peter

Wards 6 & 7
Hammill, Drake
Lane, George S. (Incumbent)
Scott, Greg

Wards 8 & 9
Cochrane, Pat (Incumbent) (acclaimed)

Wards 11 & 13
Duncan, Deborah
Kryczka, Karen
Mackie, Neil
Power, Kathy

Wards 12 & 14
Bazinet, Carol (Incumbent)
Humphreys, Gregory (Greg) C.

SEPARATE (CATHOLIC) SCHOOL BOARD TRUSTEE

Wards 1 & 2 and Cochrane
Scarpino, Serafino (Incumbent) (acclaimed)

Wards 3 & 5 and Airdrie
Wellman, Linda (Incumbent) (acclaimed)

Wards 4 & 7
Belcourt, Margaret (Incumbent) (acclaimed)

Wards 6 & 8
Burke-Gaffney, Lois H. (Incumbent)
Grochowski, Antoni (Tony)

Wards 9 & 10 and Chestermere
Goerlitz, Rosemarie
Heighes, Gerald Adam Jerry
O'Malley, Michael (Mike)

Wards 11 & 12
Annuik, Michael Vincent
Williams, Cathie (Incumbent)

Wards 13 & 14
Martin, Mary (acclaimed)

Municipal Madness

Brave citizens of the E.S. Nation:

Here's an overview of the coverage you can expect from your Calgary Municipal Election Hook-Up.

September 19th - 25th - Calgary Public School Board Trustees
  • September 19th - Wards 1 & 2
  • September 20th - Wards 3 & 4
  • September 21st - Wards 5 & 10
  • September 22nd - Wards 6 & 7
  • September 23rd - Wards 8 & 9
  • September 24th - Wards 11 & 13
  • September 25th - Wards 12 & 14
September 26th - 29th - Calgary Separate (Catholic) School Board Trustees
  • September 26th - Wards 1 & 2 plus Cochrane
  • September 27th - Wards 3 & 5 plus Airdrie, Wards 4 & 7
  • September 28th - Wards 6 & 8, Wards 9 & 10 plus Chestermere and area
  • September 29th - Wards 11 & 12, Wards 13 & 14
September 30th - October 13th - Aldermanic Races
  • September 30th - Ward 1
  • October 1st - Ward 2
  • October 2nd - Ward 3
  • October 3rd - Ward 4
  • October 4th - Ward 5
  • October 5th - Ward 6
  • October 6th - Ward 7
  • October 7th - Ward 8
  • October 8th - Ward 9
  • October 9th - Ward 10
  • October 10th - Ward 11
  • October 11th - Ward 12
  • October 12th - Ward 13
  • October 13th - Ward 14
October 14th - Mayoral Race
October 15th - VOTING DAY

Sunday, September 16, 2007

There's Something in the Air...

Autumn. There's a certain excitement in the air... no, it's not the CFL stretch drive to the playoffs (luckily, my beloved Eskimos have taken care of that distraction for me this year). Neither is it the start of the NFL season, the impending Major League Baseball playoffs (yawn!), or even the start of pre-season action in the NHL.

IT'S ELECTION SEASON, BABY!

I know I've been remiss in my duty to inform as of late. I have, however, been preparing to launch a full-out assault on the near total lack of information that accompanies each municipal election in Calgary. The refrains I hear most often during municipal elections are "I don't know who any of these people are, or what they stand for - there's no media coverage for anything but the mayor's race. I recognize the incumbent Alderman's name for my ward - MAYBE. And who the heck are all these people running for school board trustee? What IS a school board trustee?"

Nation, The Enlightened Savage is your official Calgary Municipal Election 2007 Hook-Up. You wanna know? I'll TELL you. We will be offering pillar-to-post coverage of the candidates for each position. There will, naturally, be more to say, both good and bad, about the incumbents in most cases - some of them are running on 3 or 6 (or more) years of on-the-record history. But nevertheless, we will be offering the usual in-depth analysis of EVERY race, from the Mayor's chair to Ward 8 Alderman to Catholic School Trustees...

Check back often. If there's something you want me to look into, let me know via a comment or at my email, published to the right in the "About Me" area (campaign "leaks" welcome as well). And for goodness sake, VOTE. Vote TWICE, if you can (and then let me know, so I can blow the lid off the voting improprieties). The election is Monday, October 15th.
In 2004, 17% of the eligible voters bothered to show up and exercise their right to choose their leaders. SEVENTEEN PERCENT. If you voted, five of your friends couldn't be bothered.

If that embarassing trend continues, then your vote on October 15th will be on behalf of 6 people. Make it count - cast an INFORMED ballot, by bookmarking The Enlightened Savage for all the analysis on the candidates in Calgary.

Big Poppa E.S. is your hook-up... holla if you hear me...

Thursday, September 6, 2007

What is Leadership?

Nation, we're going "off the board" on this issue: Rather than telling you all what you should think, I'm hoping instead to hear from you about what you ALREADY think about the issue.


Quite simply: "What is leadership?"

We hear a lot about leadership these days. Usually, from people whose own leadership is under question. Tories spending millions to broadcast ads that tell everyone "Stephane Dion is not a leader". Jack Layton screaming about how having our troops in Afghanistan for longer than the next 24 hours shows a "lack of leadership" on the part of the government...

What IS this "leadership" we hear so much about? Is it getting people to do what you tell them? If so, Hitler and Stalin could be characterized as great leaders. Is it being RIGHT about an issue, as Democrats keep insisting that Dubya is "a poor leader", despite the fact that everyone around him does what he tells them to? If being RIGHT is the hallmark of leadership, then shouldn't we applaud Maginot, for building the line of fortifications that, as promised, stopped the Germans from invading from the East? (they came through Belgium instead). Or is leadership all in the results? Mark Messier captained 2 teams to the Stanley Cup (the only man ever to do so), and won it 6 times in all. Is the Moose therefore a better leader than, say, Mike Bossy?

I know MY opinion... I share it with Ralph.

"I just got out in front of the parade - it was the people in the parade
that determined where we were going."

To me, leadership is knowing what the people want and need (by asking them), and then finding a middle ground between the 2, giving it to them and staying true to the core principle while being open to the evolving nature of reality.

What I'm MORE interested in is YOUR opinion, so please add it to the bottom of this post as a comment, or email privately if you prefer, at amishbuggyracing (at) gmail (dot) com.

- E.S.

Friday, August 31, 2007

New Poll

Nation, there's a new poll, as you no doubt noticed, just below the banner.

Don't read TOO much into it... yet.

But I'm really interested to hear from people who visit here whether they're as outraged at the thought of Craig Chandler as an MLA as people elsewhere on the web seem to be.

People of all parties and affiliations (even though Craig thinks you should go home!) can vote at nomination meetings, provided they pay their $5 to become party members first. You KNOW that a well-oiled political machine like Team Chandler will have bus-loads of voters from church groups and seniors' homes at the nomination meeting... and unless his opponents can get similar support AT THAT MEETING, he'll win.

If, however, the people in Calgary Egmont of ALL political stripes who believe that Chandler will not represent their best interests can band together and ensure that he does not win that nomination, keeping him and his views off the ballot, then that would be what we call "democratic karma".

So, Nation... especially those of you in Egmont... what say you?

- E.S.

Wednesday, August 29, 2007

Do You Know Who Is Exercising Your Franchise?

Nation, file this one under "Yet More Proof The Party System Is Ruining Democracy".

Craig Chandler is running for the PC nomination in the provincial riding of Calgary-Egmont. Although Chandler just officially announced his intention to run, rightly waiting until Denis Herard announced he would not be seeking re-election, this has not been secret in any way, shape, or form.

For months now, Team Chandler has been making the connections, shaking the hands, kissing the babies, and meeting the people they need to meet in order to ensure that their man wins the nomination. Nothing wrong with that - it's politics as usual. Where's the problem?

Here's the problem:

David Crutcher is a former candidate in the riding for the Alberta Alliance. He is also a former leadership candidate for the Alliance. He ran previously with the backing of Craig Chandler and his Progressive Group for Independent Business. He then, in the "Introduction Letter" for Craig Chandler, throws his endorsement behind Team Chandler. He has since been elected President of the PC Association for Calgary-Egmont.

Now, let's ignore the far-right views of Crutcher for a moment (admittedly difficult, but let's try). The bottom line here, is that by hook or by crook, Team Chandler and their proxy, a former candidate for the leadership of a far-right party, have won control of the constituency of Calgary-Egmont and, therefore, its nomination process. Is this going to be another Calgary West debacle? KNOWING that the President of the Association backs a particular candidate, KNOWING that the President has family members working on that candidate's campaign for the nomination, who in their right mind is going to run against Chandler and think they have a snowball's chance in hell of winning?

Chandler WILL win the nomination - by acclamation or in a vote, he has the back-room of the constituency association lined up behind him, and he WILL carry the PC banner into the next election. This being part of the Federal riding of Calgary South-East, long held by Jason Kenney, Conservative nee Canadian Alliance nee Reform Party M.P., the riding will vote Tory. Chandler will take his seat in the Legislature, and cast his vote as he sees fit on behalf of the 39,531 souls who live there.

That's politics... what's the big deal?

The big deal is this... one of Chandler's biggest backers is the aforementioned Mr. Crutcher, former leadership candidate for the Alberta Alliance. Among Crutcher's ideas were the institution of an Alberta Sales Tax, banning same-sex marriage, and promoting Alberta Separatism if the Liberals win power in Ottawa. Other big backers include Link Byfield, of the fledgling Wild Rose Party, and Rob Anders (like we need a laundry-list of Rob's crimes against common sense).

The PC Party of Alberta is supposed to be a big tent... even in its name, the "Progressive Conservative" party suggests that there is room for people of different approaches, values, and beliefs. But it's not THAT big a tent... which party, exactly, is the PC Association of Alberta supposed to be? Looking at Team Chandler, it's part PC, part Wild Rose, part Alberta Alliance... everything to the right of centre, with enough dashes of "right wing ideologue" to make one wonder if the social far right has finally found a way to take power in Alberta.

Indeed, the Ford-ism of "you can have whatever colour of car you want, as long as it's black" seems to making a comeback, except in Chandler-land it has become "you can vote however you like, as long as it's for a Conservative - or you can get the hell out". Visit daveberta for more on this enlightened and inclusive attitude from the member-in-waiting from Calgary-Egmont.

So, to the members of the PC party in Calgary-Egmont: When Craig Chandler speaks for you, as your candidate, for whom will he truly be speaking? Those of you who have supported Denis Herard, the "Red Tory" for all these years? Or his backers from the Alberta Alliance and the Wild Rose Party and social conservative think-tanks?

And to all the people of Calgary-Egmont: When he stands to speak and vote on your behalf, using your franchise in the Legislature of Alberta, in whose interests will Craig Chandler be acting? Yours? Or those of his social conservative friends and supporters? Will he be paying back favours to groups that supported him, like Concerned Christians Canada, and the Canada Family Action Coalition? 39,531 people live in Calgary Egmont. Many are pro-choice. Many are homosexual. Thousands are not Christian. And thousands are not conservative in ANY way, social or otherwise. When he casts that vote on behalf of ALL of you, will you know for certain if it's YOUR best interests that he has in mind?

Ask him. At the nomination meeting, on the hustings, at the town hall meetings, at the debates. Show up, and ask Craig Chandler who he represents. If the answer isn't "YOU", he doesn't deserve to sit in that chair, and cast YOUR vote as he sees fit.

If Chandler's supporters are worried about the nation's soul, they should pray for it. If they're worried about our children, they should give them something to do. If they don't think their own political parties can win power, they should ask themselves WHY that is the case.

Or, they can just seize control of a constituency association for the party most likely to win, run their own hand-picked candidate, and take the power and influence they want, to pursue their own social conservative agenda - dissent-be-damned.

One riding at a time.

- E.S.

Wednesday, August 22, 2007

Three Amigos Meet, Protestors Go Loco

Well, Nation, the time has come and gone once again when the leaders of Mexico, the United States, and Canada get together, pow-wow, discuss issues of mutual interest, and go their seperate ways.


Predictably, the idiocy of the protestors who presented themselves was rivalled only by the disproportionate media coverage given same idiots.


Now, I want to go on the record as saying that protest is not only a vital and worthwhile element in a democratic society, it is an absolute necessity. Man's rebellious nature, and his inherant disinclination to be ruled, has lead to some of the greatest societal advances in our collective history. I truly believe the words of Oscar Wilde when he said:
Disobedience, in the eyes of anyone who has read history, is man’s original
virtue. It is through disobedience that progress had been made, through
disobedience and through rebellion.



That being said... these protestors are NOT the type who will be responsible for some of those great advances.


For starters, many of them aren't truly protesting anything in particular. The reality is, they're there because they hate George Bush. Or, at least, that's why they THINK they're there... in truth, they're brought there by one thing, and one thing only: Ego.

They WANT to be photographed, and interviewed by the media, and shown on televisions across the country being dragged away by police after a riot. In their sweat-soaked fantasies, it's what they dream about. They truly believe the police are there to stop them from proselytizing the "truth". Them. SPECIFICALLY them. They suffer from an inherant egocentrism... everything revolves around me, and my cause. The police have my picture, they're being sent on direct orders from Stephen Harper to silence ME, because I am a huge threat to his dictatorial rule.


Almost as humourous is their insistence that all violence during protests is the fault of the "draconian" right-wing rulers of the country in question... either George Bush ordered the police to open fire, or someone who wants desperately to BE George Bush did so. Liberal governments would never trample on my rights like this... it's just those bloody neo-con neanderthals. How quickly they forget that lefties from Jean Chretien to Fidel Castro have been in power during similar "squashes" of protestors. Hell, Chretien didn't just let the RCMP pepper-spray protestors, he eventually decided to start beating them up himself.


Let's be honest here, protestor: You're doing yourself, and your cause, more harm than good by acting like an idiot. Throwing a rock at a police officer while you call him "pig" isn't going to end well. For you, or for your cause. Normal citizens don't sit in their living room watching the 6 o'clock news and say "Gee, William, I hadn't really thought of it before... but that young man who just spat in the policeman's face really changed my mind about going carbon neutral".


Protest is good and natural and right. It is a fundamentally requisite force in our civilization. But your right to protest begins and ends with your right to free speech, and your right to assembly. You do NOT have the right to storm the hotel where the Prime Minister is staying, to make your point to him in person. You do NOT have the right to attack police. And when you do, you prove what many of us suspect: You're not ticked off about the environment, or free trade, or Bush's foreign policy. You're just angry, and desperate for attention. You'd be protesting if Stephane Dion was Prime Minister, and Hillary was President. You'd be protesting is CELINE Dion was Prime Minister. And I'd be right there with you.


But the second you raised your hand to strike a cop, I'd knock you on your self-important ass. Because the cops in that line are sworn to put their lives on the line to protect your right to PEACEFUL protest. Martin Luther King never slugged a cop in his blessed life. His cause was more just than yours can ever hope to be.

You're not being supressed because Steve Harper wants to be George Bush's friend. You're not being supressed by the U.S. Government any more than you're being supressed by the Illuminati. You're being supressed by your own inability to get your message across in a non-violent way. The only thing holding you down is your lack of imagination and creativity. Fund-raise, and buy advertising time. Get Al Gore on your side. Do a documentary on a rented video camera. Throw a toonie into the Speaker's Corner machine. E-mail a letter to the editor. Write David Suzuki. Do what you have to do to bring attention to your issue.


But remember: If you can't make your point without violence, it probably wasn't worth making in the first place. Trying to provoke police doesn't make you a hero, it makes you the father of a mob. Every person who gets hurt as a result isn't blood on the hands of police, or of Harper, or of Karl Rove or the Jewish Banking Conspiracy or the N.S.A. or the military-industrial complex: It's blood on YOUR hands. And what it says to the world is "my issue isn't what it says on my placard - I'm just angry because nobody thinks I'm important - pay attention to me".


That's adolescent petulance. And if you act like one, you'll be treated like one.


Now go to your room.


- E.S.

Tuesday, August 14, 2007

Federal Cabinet Shuffle - Analysis

Well, at first blush, it seems like the Harper Government has addressed its most pressing needs. Those needs, of course, are to a) appear to be moving forward, rather than stalled; and b) to move ministers in problem portfolios to new digs, and move in what they hope to be problem-solvers.

For the most part, this is a shuffle in the truest sense of the word: same cards in different places. But let's break down the moves:

Peter McKay - Minister of National Defence
McKay did a good job at Foreign Affairs, although he seemed to be at times conflicted about his role as a diplomat and how it contrasted with his image as a politician who gave straight answers. McKay should do fine in his new position, as long as he remembers that he speaks for Canada's civilians, who (for the most part) don't know what the hell they're talking about vis-a-vis the military.

Gordon O'Connor - Minister of Revenue
O'Connor needed out of Defence, about 4 months ago. He's still in cabinet, but in a vastly reduced role. So long as the government keeps collecting taxes, Gordon shouldn't be able to mess this up too badly. He was in over his head and had trouble communicating with the public about our mission in Afghanistan. Revenue has few such pot-holes - nobody expects to be able to understand the tax code anyhow.

Bev Oda - Minister of International Co-operation
Oda was a capable minister, but was absolutely hamstrung in Heritage by her lack of French. She should be able to shine in this new role.

Josee Verner - Minister of Canadian Heritage
As a Francophone, Verner has an advantage over Oda in the role. It will be interesting to see, given her staunch conservative views, how Minister Verner deals with the arts community given their general liberal bias.

Jim Prentice - Minister of Industry
Prentice will be the first Albertan to hold this post. Expect little benefit from this fact to come to Alberta, though, as Ontario and Quebec will be watching Prentice very closely in his role in a traditional "Old Canada" cabinet post. Prentice is an extremely capable minister and smart politician - the only thing that limits his mobility in a Harper cabinet is geography - there is little room for 2 high-ranking Calgarians in the top 5 government spots, and Harper's unlikely to move any time soon.

Maxime Bernier - Minister of Foreign Affairs
A rising star from the Quebec Caucus, Bernier will be given a chance to spread his wings in this very visible role. His ability to play with others will be the determining factor as to whether this is a stop on the way to greater things or, like with so many others, a one-way ticket to nowhere.

Gerry Ritz - Minister of Agriculture
The Saskatchewan MP inherits the Wheat Board mess from Chuck Strahl. Sitting in a minority situation, the Harper Tories have had to be very, VERY careful about being seen to be favouring the West and, as a result, have perhaps over-compensated, and ignored the West's needs in favour of the East. Westerners have grumbled, but, with no other option, most of that grumbling will result in Tories winning Western ridings by only 55%, instead of 60%. Knowing this, one would have to assume that Stephen Harper spoke at great length with Ritz about what was needed to do the job effectively, and Harper must have confidence in Ritz to deal with the issue. Whether this confidence is misplaced or not, only time will tell.

Chuck Strahl - Minister of Indian Affairs
Very popular on both sides of the floor, Strahl will find the Indian Affairs portfolio a welcome change. With the great work that Prentice did on this file, he will be a tough act to follow, but if Strahl can just keep the political heat on the bureaucrats to get the various deals done, he'll be fine here.

Diane Ablonczy - Sec. State for Tourism & Small Business
Ablonczy is the only new face in this cabinet, as a junior minister. A victim of geography until now, she will be given a chance to grow in this position. Unfortunately, she will have to distinguish herself as a shooting star to get ahead, as a Calgary MP in the same cabinet as Jim Prentice, Jason Kenney, and Stephen Harper.

Cabinet Musings...

Nation, stay tuned to The Enlightened Savage for updates and commentary on the new Federal Cabinet.

As leaks begin to trickle out ahead of today's expected announcement, notable musings include:
- Stockwell Day or Peter McKay to Defense
- Jason Kenny to Finance or Revenue
- Helena Guergis to Foreign Affairs (I doubt it, but we'll see)

As I said, stay tuned.

- E.S.

UPDATE 3:30 Eastern:

McKay to Defense
Bernier to Foreign Affairs
Strahl to Indian Affairs
Prentice to Industry
Ablonczy is getting a post as well, which doesn't bode well for Kenney - too many Calgarians in the cabinet to promote Kenney.

Baird, Cannon, Ambrose, Hearn, Flaherty and Hill stay put.

UPDATE - 3:45 Eastern

McKay - National Defense
O'Connor - Revenue
Oda - Int'l Co-operation
Verner - Heritage
Prentice - Industry
Bernier - Foreign Affairs
Ritz - Agriculture
Strahl - Indian Affairs
Ablonczy - Sec. State for Tourism

Wednesday, August 8, 2007

Council of the Federation Meets - Not a Klingon in Sight...

Nation, tomorrow marks the beginning of the annual Council of the Federation meetings - this year, taking place in Moncton. This is going to be an interesting event for a couple of reasons.

Firstly, it will be Albertans' first chance to see how their newly-minted Premier, Ed Stelmach, interacts with his fellow Premiers. Ed's been in the political game for a while, but he hasn't been the Chief Cook & Bottle Washer of Canada's economic engine for all that long. Other Premiers, notably Jean Charest and Dalton McGuinty, are saying that they aim to take action on pollution and carbon emissions, but will not "impose" anything on Alberta. Being politicians, we'll have to wait and see if they mean what they say.
Indeed, Ed's performance is going to be watched very closely at these meetings, not least of all by the wolves on the right fringes of punditry whom have been baying for Ed's head since about 10 minutes after the second ballot votes were tallied.

If Stelmach shows a total disinclination towards co-operation at any real cost to Alberta, it will show that, beyond a shadow of a doubt, the salad days of inter-provincial co-operation are over, for better or for worse. Granted, Alberta faces its own unique challenges, as does Ed's government - let's remember that he has yet to win a general election, and a full mandate from Martha and Henry. Ed's job as our Premier is to help us meet and overcome those challenges. IF he can do that while still maintaining good relationships with the other provinces, it will be a bonus. But he needs to tread very carefully when considering what concessions he can afford to make to Dalton, Jean and the others: The voters in Mississauga and Sherbrooke don't pay Ed's wages, the voters in Drayton Valley and Athabasca do. He needs to remember that, because those same voters certainly will.
It begs the question, "what other option do Albertans have to protect the province from outside plundering?". Currently, the answer is "none", although those same howling pseudo-intellectuals would have you believe that the Wildrose Party is ready to seize power from the Tories as soon as this Winter.

Look, Nation, let's be clear on this: The Wildrose initiative is a good and healthy one for Albertans to consider. I encourage EVERYONE to visit their website, and come to your own conclusions. I agree with the group's founding principles. But this party is as ready to take the reins of power as I am (which is to say, not at all). It has no official platform, no leader, no policies, has yet to define itself on the political spectrum (although social conservatives are salivating at the chance to co-opt the movement), no capacity for fund-raising, and it doesn't even have official party status. By the time the party hits a ballot, it could look like anything from the UFA to the Alberta First Party to the Lougheed Tories. Wildrose may very well be a player in a handful of years. But it is NOT a factor in Alberta at present, and all the wishful thinking in the world by hardcore backers won't change that fact.
Stelmach needs to be wary of Henry and Martha's reaction to his performance, but to think he looks under the bed for the Wildrose Party at night is nothing short of preposterous.

The other interesting dynamic to watch in these meetings will be how the Premiers co-operate - or not - in their approach to the Federal Government of Stephen Harper. It's currently the prevailing opinion that the Harper Tories are "in like Flynn", and unlikely to head to the hustings any time soon, with a political dead heat in public opinion polls. The Liberals don't want an election, the NDP don't want an election, the Tories don't want an election, and (rightly so) nobody gives a damn what the Bloc wants. But one scandal, one slip of the tongue or one international mis-step could build enough momentum for one of the parties that we find ourselves with a new government in the next year, be it a Tory majority, or a change in governments altogether.

The Harper Tories have been good for the provinces in some ways, and bad for them in some others. It will be interesting to see if the Harper Haters (Danny Williams and Lorne Calvert, to start) will take the whole chance to just take a giant crap on the Feds at every step, or whether they'll moderate their tone somewhat in the face of political uncertainty. I'm betting on option A. Danny and Lorne would rather have Prime Minister Dion to try and push around. As for the others... as I said, the Tories have been good for them in some ways, and bad for them in others.
It could be that "neutrality" is a term we'll hear at this conference that isn't automatically preceded by the word "carbon".

For political junkies, this is going to be a fun 2 days in an otherwise bleak landscape (municipal election hype notwithstanding). Let the games begin!

- E.S.

Tuesday, August 7, 2007

Is Stelmach "sharking" Kevin Taft?

Nation, once again I apologize for the extended absence. Without giving too much away (my government job security, after all, relies on my continued anonymity), let's just say that notable events in the province have kept me very busy for the past few weeks.


Things have been relatively quiet as late, politically... and although several issues are coming to light in the past few days (Arctic sovereignty, Calgary's violent crime spree, Paris Hilton got a new dog) that will no doubt consume the public consciousness, one area lacking in any flashy sound bites or pulpit-pounding protests in the provincial political scene in Alberta. Things have calmed down for the summer - which gives us a chance to take a sober second look at the first half-year of the Stelmach regime in Alberta.


The thing about still waters, is that they tend to either run deepest, or to be stagnant ponds of scum - but enough about Paul Martin, we're talking Alberta politics. The problem with the old stand-by metaphors is that they aren't necessarily relevant to today's Henry or Martha Albertan. So, we'll go with the latest craze to sweep the nation's deep thinkers...

Poker.

For the first few months of his leadership, Ed Stelmach wasn't playing a lot of hands. There was a lot going on - growth pressures, naming his cabinet, etc. - but he wasn't a daily presence on our television screens. You got the impression that nothing was happening. Ed seemed to be, in poker terms, bleeding chips. Whereas our former premier had a tendency to get right to the heart of things, raise "all in", and stare down any who opposed him (media, opposition politicians, AISH recipients, etc.), Ed seemed to be doing, well, NOTHING. Kevin Taft or one of his lieutenants seemed to be making the radio or television circuits every day, screaming about the lack of affordable housing. Those who were unhappy with his election to the party leadership over their own interests were upset at his moderate views, or his perceived rural bias, or the lack of Calgarians in cabinet. The raises and re-raises were fast and furious - who's maddest at Eddie? But when the betting came around to the Premier's turn, we got the last thing we expected after the past 15 years... we got silence.

"Is Ed even there?", we wondered. "Is he paying attention?". Clearly, some people believe that he's not. Mostly, they believe that Stelmach was the wrong choice for the PC Party, and is the wrong choice for Alberta. But, here's the rub: the guy who's sitting quietly at the table is often the guy with all the chips at the end.

Premier Stelmach hasn't allowed himself to be bullied by the groups and politicians clamouring for more impetuous actions on his part. He hasn't panicked when pressed. He hasn't found himself "pot committed", and had to follow good chips with bad. He's quietly, methodically, played the cards as they've come. He knows what he wants to do, and he's doing it on his timetable.

As anyone who plays poker can tell you, the person who wins the game isn't always the one who plays the best. And it is VERY rarely the person who gets dealt the best cards. Rather, it's the person who goes in with a game plan, and sticks to it. The PATIENT player wins, more often than not. It's called "playing tight", and Ed Stelmach is either asleep at the switch, or he has it down to a science. He's the player who stays in for 1 of every 10 hands. The player who gets mocked by the others - at least, early in the game. "Whoah, miracles never cease, Ed's actually PLAYING a hand". At the end of the night, Ed has all the chips. Try mocking that.


Nation, I don't know if the Stelmachs play poker. Maybe it's a "cribbage home", or they prefer bridge, or pinochle. For all I know, NONE of the Stelmachs play poker, let alone the Premier. But if he DOES, then Kevin Taft had better be careful how hard he pushes the stakes - because if Ed Stelmach really IS slow-playing his hand, then Kevin is going to need a barrel to wear for that long, lonely walk home.


Because the Tories don't play to make it to the final table... they play to win, they play for keeps, and the past 3 decades weren't a streak of lucky hands.