tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6929537540404873123.post2836220425870046850..comments2023-10-04T06:59:20.803-06:00Comments on The Enlightened Savage: Debate: After the Third Commercial BreakEnlightened Savagehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17872131888278838737noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6929537540404873123.post-25594535759129432032008-02-22T00:48:00.000-07:002008-02-22T00:48:00.000-07:00Having now gone back and read several posts, I'd s...Having now gone back and read several posts, I'd say you've got a pretty good blog going here!Brian Dellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01987594019787137564noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6929537540404873123.post-46730796597411433842008-02-22T00:04:00.000-07:002008-02-22T00:04:00.000-07:00"somehow, him putting the royalties back where the..."somehow, him putting the royalties back where they were is going to get us more money for infrastructure"<BR/><BR/>See Jack Mintz' analysis which I provided at http://members.shaw.ca/lldell/corptaxes.htmBrian Dellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01987594019787137564noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6929537540404873123.post-83943477007605599312008-02-21T21:13:00.000-07:002008-02-21T21:13:00.000-07:00"Mason scores with a "Gotchya" against Taft on har..."Mason scores with a "Gotchya" against Taft on hard caps, and his voting record."<BR/><BR/>Except Mason is wrong. The Liberals voted against an NDP amendment to a government bill not on the grounds that they opposed hard caps, but because they thought the bill was beyond repair and needed to be defeated. See the [url=http://www.assembly.ab.ca/ISYS/LADDAR_files/docs/hansards/han/legislature_26/session_3/20070410_1300_01_han.pdf]Hansard[/url]. I'm not sure I agree with the Liberals on that one, but Mason is being at least a little dishonest.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com